Author’s Note
The following introduction is a work of historical fiction, drawn from Van Gogh’s letters, medical records, and the recollections of those who knew him. Many of his most recognized works were completed between seizures, letters, and fits; Painted within the bounds of an asylum where he had voluntarily sought refuge. There, between the fragile peace of lucidity and the fractures of collapse, he created visions that would outlive his own stability. People still debate whether those visions were the product of his madness or if what we call madness was simply the consequence of his seeing too clearly.
I choose not to pathologize what made his work unique. To do so would be to deny the truth of its cost. The price demanded for each perception wrought on canvas. This piece is not a romanticization of suffering, but an attempt to stand for a moment in the storm, to glimpse how beauty can be both symptom and salvation.
~Dom
The room is small, and the air trembles.
Candlelight flickers against the stone walls, its reflection wavering in the turpentine sheen on the floorboards. The smell is sharp; oil and smoke, lavender pressed into linen to keep the madness at bay. Outside, the night hums with the sound of cicadas, and the wind drags its fingers through the cypress.
He has not slept. He cannot. There is something behind the stars tonight, something that won’t let him rest until he gives it shape.
His hand shakes, but the brush is steady. Muscle memory overriding exhaustion. He paints the motion he feels, not the one he sees. The heavens writhe; they pulse like veins beneath translucent skin. The moon expands, spilling yellow fire into the deep blue of the world. He knows it is wrong, knows no sky moves like this, but truth has long since stopped caring for accuracy.
The canvas breathes back at him, alive, convulsing, radiant.
There are whispers in the corridor beyond his door. Orderlies, soft-footed, carrying restraint straps and morphine. They do not see him as he is now: lucid, clear, aflame. They see only the trembling, the confusion, the collapse. But here, in this act, he is godlike.
Every brushstroke is an exorcism. Every color, a cry.
He paints the movement of time itself, the turbulence of existence rendered in cobalt and white. The walls close in and open again. For a moment, he cannot tell if he is inside his mind or if his mind has escaped into the sky.
Perhaps both. Perhaps neither. Perhaps the difference no longer matters.
He steps back. His heart hammers in his chest like wings beating against glass. The stars whirl, the trees twist upward, and the world inside the frame begins to settle into its own order. One that obeys no law but his.
His lips part. The breath he releases trembles between awe and despair.
He has done it. The night is alive.
…
A woman stands before the same canvas, a hundred and thirty years later. The gallery is quiet, air-conditioned, reverent. She tilts her head slightly, taking in the soft light and color. The placard beside the frame reads The Starry Night, 1889. She smiles.
‘It’s beautiful,’ she thinks. Peaceful. Soothing. She lifts her phone, captures a photo, and adds a filter that makes the yellows a little brighter. Her caption will read, “A masterpiece. Imagine seeing the world like this.”
She moves on to the next exhibit.
Behind her, the painted sky still churns. A relic of fever, faith, and fracture, the sanity of one man written in the language of his undoing.
The Useless Miracle
Somewhere between hunger and grace, humanity began to decorate its own survival.
The first handprints on cave walls were not warnings, not maps, not messages, they were presence. A declaration that someone was, that life had passed this way. From pigment blown through hollow reeds to orchestras that shake marble halls, we continue the same strange ritual: we make things that serve no practical function, but which insist on meaning.
We humans are, by nature, utilitarian animals. We invent to live longer lives, to eat safer food, to fight more effectively. Yet the moment those needs are met, we begin to waste time magnificently. We carve, we sing, we dance, we tell stories to the fire. The act of creation itself becomes the pulse of something larger, a surplus of energy transformed into reverence. In that sense, art is not a luxury of civilization; it is civilization’s luxury.
It is what we do when we remember we are not only alive, but aware of being so.
Neurologically, art rewards the mind for recognizing itself. We are drawn to symmetry, rhythm, and color not because they feed us, but because they are a neurological handshake of comprehension. They let us see our own perception in motion, to mirror understanding with form. That flicker of recognition, the moment something feels true despite having no use, is the brain’s small hallelujah.
Anthropologists have long noted that every culture, no matter how isolated or impoverished, produces music and imagery.
A species that paints its caves before it builds its shelters is telling us something profound about itself: that survival is not the same as living. Beauty is the proof of our refusal to remain beasts.
Art, then, is a useless miracle. It is an act of remembering that we can feel. It has no measurable yield, no output to justify its cost, and yet it continues to appear wherever consciousness gathers. It is both rebellion and remembrance: rebellion against the cold arithmetic of existence, and remembrance that our lives mean more than their utility.
Yet, for all its elevation of the species, art often devours the artist. The same impulse that allows us to touch eternity leaves the artist burned and brittle, consumed by the very light they conjure. Creation gives humanity its soul, but never promised not to take one in return.
The Price of Making
Every act of creation extracts a price, though its currency varies. For some, the toll is measured in hours and commissions; for others, in years of obscurity or the erosion of sanity itself. The spectrum runs from the artisan’s transaction to the visionary’s unraveling, bound by the same quiet truth: to make something beautiful is to offer a part of oneself to be used.
At one end stands the artisan, the illustrator, the designer, the one who renders beauty as service. Their skill is honed and deliberate, their art a form of commerce; a translation of vision into deliverable. Their hands obey the aesthetic of others, shaping what is asked for rather than what demands to be born. There is dignity in it, even grace, but also compromise. Theirs is the craft of restraint, the ability to silence one’s own voice long enough to speak fluently in another’s.
Farther along the line is the unknown visionary, whose art resists transaction entirely. These are the poets and painters who speak into silence, their audience unborn or uninterested. Van Gogh, Kafka, Dickinson. The ones whose messages arrived decades late. They create as if building rafts for futures they will never see, driven less by recognition than by personal compulsion. For them, the making itself is the only response possible to existing. The cost is isolation. The reward, if any, belongs to those who come after.
Then, there is the constrained genius, the master bound to patronage. Da Vinci painting saints for the politics of dukes, Michelangelo carving divinity beneath papal ceilings. Their brilliance was purchased and confined, their freedom bought by servitude. Patronage has always been a double-edged salvation: it sustains the artist while keeping them on a leash woven from gold and expectation. Every patron commissions reflection, then flinches at what looks back.
Across centuries, the paradox endures. Society desires art but fears the artist. We celebrate the product of unbridled imagination while pathologizing its source. We want revelation without disturbance, transcendence without truth. We hold the mirror close enough to see our beauty, but not our distortion.
In every age, the artist trades a portion of self. The question is only whether it’s for money, posterity, or sanity. The painter who bargains away vision for stability, the musician who loses anonymity to survive, the writer who burns their own certainty to light the path for others.
The act of making remains sacred precisely because it is costly. And like all sacred things, its price is rarely fair.
The Dual Life of the Modern Creator
To live as a creator today is to walk a line between devotion and disguise. The painter balances accounts. The musician teaches scales to children who will forget them. The writer drafts corporate copy with the same precision once reserved for poetry. Between each obligation, a pulse persists; the echo of the work they were meant to do, waiting in the quiet margins of their life.
The creative double life is both mask and necessity. The artist must appear functional, responsible, and ‘sane,’ or at least socially legible. Hunger does not forgive inspiration, and rent does not bow to vision. They step from one world to the other like an actor moving between scenes: one lit by the steady fluorescence of survival, the other by the erratic glow of imagination.
Each requires performance. Each consumes a different kind of honesty.
Modern economies prize the product but dismember the process. We purchase the painting but not the sleeplessness behind it; the song, but not the bin full of crinkled failures that preceded it. Creation is commodified only after it ceases to threaten, once it can be packaged neatly between algorithms and deadlines. The result is a culture that loves art but distrusts artists, one that craves transcendence while demanding deliverables.
In that divide, many creators become their own translators, converting passion into productivity, compressing revelation into something… billable. Yet beneath the veneer of professionalism, traces remain: acrylic dust wiped from fingernails before the meeting begins, a spreadsheet half-buried beneath sketches, melodies scribbled in the margins of quarterly reports. These are the small rebellions of those who refuse to surrender entirely, the evidence of a second pulse beating beneath polite conformity.
It would be easy to call this compromise tragic, but perhaps it is something nobler. Even bound by necessity, creation endures.
It hides in lunch breaks, late nights, and open browser tabs. It waits, patient as a seed in concrete, ready to break through at the first hint of rain. Because to create, even in fragments, even unseen, is an act of faith.
It is hope made visible, a declaration that THEIR meaning still matters, even when the world never thinks to ask for it. Even then, creation persists. Because to create is to hope.
Art as Hope
Every genuine act of creation is an invitation. To create is to open a door between inner and outer worlds and leave it unlocked for anyone who might need the shelter of recognition. I believe, still, that authentic art is not an exhibition of ego, but of empathy.
It is not a declaration of self-importance, but of recognition: I have seen something worth keeping alive, and I refuse to let it vanish.
In its purest form, art is a communion between strangers. A poem, a painting, a melody; each is an act of exposure that asks nothing in return but understanding. When we look at Van Gogh’s stars, we are not seeing the sky. We are seeing a man’s, or perhaps all men’s, refusal to be extinguished. The brushstrokes are the pulse of a man who could not bear for beauty to die unrecognized.
His work is not a record of madness. It was one of endurance, testament to the will to keep perceiving when the world became too sharp to touch. To create, then, is an act of rebellion. Beauty is defiance against entropy, a stand against the slow erosion of meaning.
Every work of art says: the world is still worth looking at. Even now. Especially now.
In this way, art becomes both resistance and resurrection. It stands as our refusal to let perception die in a single pair of eyes. It keeps humanity awake.
And perhaps what we call madness is not the loss of reason, but its amplification; the mind’s desperate refusal to go blind to meaning. The artist bears that strain so that others may rest a little easier, believing that somewhere, someone still sees.
…
Centuries later, another figure stands beneath the open sky. Not in a gallery, but outside. Alone, perhaps, or with someone they love. The air is cool. The stars shimmer. They do not think of the man who painted them, or the asylum walls that held him, but for a heartbeat they feel the same trembling awe. The same pulse of recognition.
And in that moment, however brief, they see through Van Gogh’s eyes. The night is alive again.
Author’s Note (Yes, Another)
Each song included in this piece was chosen not just for its sound, but for its echo.
Every track comes from an artist who left, or was taken from, the world far too soon. Some were claimed by despair. Some by violence. Some by silence, or the slow erosion of being too much in a world that rarely knows what to do with that kind of fire.
Some died famous. Others became so only after they were gone. But each of them burned brightly; too brightly, maybe – and left behind a sound that refuses to be quiet.
Their music, like the art of Van Gogh, reminds us what it means to feel deeply, to speak truth through fracture, and to offer beauty even when it costs everything.
Not all of them were called geniuses in their time. But all of them were legends.
And all of them are gone.This soundtrack is for them. For what they gave the rest of us, and for what we still hear.
~Dom
Leave a comment