Author’s Note
Of all the virtues I’ve tried to write through recently, justice is the one that doesn’t sit still. The others—integrity, truth, momentum, stewardship—let you take their measure, eventually. You can plan for them, build patterns around them. But justice shifts while you speak. It changes shape in the space between law and equity, between balance and weight, between silence and repair.
This piece begins, as many of mine do, with a myth—Dike, the wandering goddess of justice, sent down to tally right and wrong, and returning with stories instead of sums. I didn’t write this to define justice, but to name what has warped it. What we miss when we confuse stillness with peace. What we lose when we treat history like a sidebar.
Justice, if it matters, must be practiced—not performed. And practice means repetition, discomfort, cost. It means keeping your eyes open when a blindfold would be easier.
The virtue is not in the scale. It’s in the hands that carry the weight, and the eyes that stay open.
And the one thing it is not, in the words of Dr. King, is patient:
“As long as justice is postponed we always stand on the verge of these darker nights of social disruption.”
~Dom
Before she became a statue—before bronze eyelids were soldered shut and scales welded to silent wrists—Dike was the only goddess still willing to get mud on her sandals.
Olympus preferred its justice tidy. Themis drafted decrees in perfect symmetry, Zeus thunder‑stamped them into law, and the lesser gods filed away the parchment, confident that order alone could keep the cosmos humming. Their version of justice was bookkeeping: columns balanced, disputes settled, harmony restored—at least on paper.
But bookkeeping cannot smell the rot in the storeroom.
So they sent Dike to audit the mortal world, expecting neat tallies of crimes and punishments. Instead, she wandered—through spice bazaars where merchants palmed extra weight onto the scales, through border towns where soldiers levied tolls that emptied widow’s purses, through courts where guilt and poverty were synonyms.
Night after night, she scratched not numbers but names into the margin of her cloak: Myron, who stole grain for his sister’s fever broth. Thaleia, fined a month’s wage for weeping outside the sanctioned hours of mourning. Selinus, imprisoned for hauling water from a river the king had declared private.
Their stories clung to her like burrs—irritating, unforgettable, woven into the fabric now.
When she finally climbed the marble steps of Olympus again, the gods expected ledgers. She brought testimony. Zeus asked for balance—She offered weight. Themis extended her gilded scales—Dike dropped them, let the clang echo through the vaulted hall, and called them tools of silence.
Her voice cracked the hush:
“You call symmetry virtue. I call it anesthesia. You praise impartiality. I have seen who profits when the law forgets its history.”
Order, the gods insisted, must be simple to be supreme. Complexity breeds dissent; context breeds doubt. And doubt, they feared, might topple their thrones.
So they tried her for insubordination. In the only courtroom where verdicts cannot be appealed, Dike argued that neutrality without memory is complicity, that peace without repair is surrender, and that a blindfold makes it easier to keep using the same chains.
She lost.
They bound her rebellion in iconography: blindfolded, silent, balanced—to reassure themselves that justice should never again raise her eyes. They scattered replicas across mortal realms, hoping worship of the symbol would drown out the memory of the witness.
It didn’t work.
Because monuments muffle nothing. Walk past a courthouse at dusk, and you might still hear her counting under her breath, tracing each chisel mark on the pillars, whispering the question Olympus refused to answer:
Who benefits from the silence?
Recommended Listening:
The Lie of Balance
The blindfold on Justice was never meant to protect the weak; it was forged to spare the strong the burden of being seen.
We recite the myth in civics classes: eyes covered, scales steady, sword at rest. A comforting tableau—until you notice the pedestal is set on uneven ground. When you refuse to look down, the tilt feels natural.
Indifference masquerading as neutrality
Blind justice punishes a hungry child for shoplifting but shrugs when a corporation erases a pension fund with a keystroke. It jails the protester who blocks traffic for fifteen minutes—never mind the hedge fund that crashes pensions in fifteen seconds, then gets bailed out and celebrated on the cover of Forbes.
To the privileged, this feels impartial: the rules apply to everyone, they say, as though everyone began with the same margin for error. Aristotle called equality treating like cases alike—but a philosopher’s maxim becomes a weapon when the law decides who is alike and who is other.
Symmetry without history
Redlines drawn in the 1930s still trace today’s school boundaries; under‑funded schools birth arrest statistics; arrest statistics justify heavier policing; heavier policing feeds voter suppression. The loop completes itself so elegantly that the architects of inequality can step back and admire its geometry.
A justice that refuses to see power is not blind; it is blinkered. It confuses quiet streets with peace, compliance with consent, punishment with accountability. It is a caretaker of the status quo—polishing the locks while congratulating itself on keeping everyone “safe.”
Keeping the silence profitable
Every system resists scrutiny that might threaten its dividends. So the myth persists: if the scales don’t move, order reigns. Meanwhile wealth buys smaller sentences, proximity to power earns second chances, and “mistakes were made” replaces names in every press release. Balance becomes an anesthetic, lulling the comfortable to sleep while the ground shifts beneath the rest.
True justice pries off the blindfold, studies the slope, and asks: Who set the foundation? Who benefits from the tilt? It is less concerned with symmetry than with repair, less dazzled by order than by the possibility of healing.
Because when an entire hillside slides, leveling the houses is not enough—you must shore up the earth beneath them.
The Weight of Context
Justice cannot survive on snapshots. It needs the full film reel—the frames before the act, the credits that roll after. Context is the lens that refuses to blur the background so the foreground looks tidy.
A still frame can convict the guilty—or erase the conditions that created them. Rewind. Zoom out. Start again.
History inside the headline
A headline reads Eviction Notice Served. Context reveals the landlord raised rent 60 percent after a tax break meant to spur “urban renewal.” The tenant’s wages stayed flat; the heat in the building never worked. One sentence becomes a saga about policy, power, and acceptable collateral damage.
Patterns hiding inside choices
A teenager pockets cough syrup. To the surveillance camera it is theft; to the medical chart it is untreated asthma; to the grocery receipt it is a parent choosing diapers over medicine. Context doesn’t excuse the act—it maps the chain of causes so we know which link to break first.
Three‑strikes laws, cash‑bail schedules, zip‑code school funding: each claims impartiality until you overlay a map of historic zoning, bank loan approval rates, or which streets still lack broadband. Suddenly the “bad choices” look less like isolated misfires and more like coordinates on a well‑worn route.
The lens that keeps shifting
Context is dynamic: what mattered yesterday may invert tomorrow. Hurricane paths rewrite crime patterns. A pandemic redefines “essential” labor. An algorithm learned on skewed data becomes a sentencing tool that extends the skew. Justice must update its maps as relentlessly as the world redraws its lines.
That is why discernment is slow work. It asks us to listen past the first version of the story, to verify the numbers and the narrative, to let curiosity interrupt certainty. The patience this requires is not softness—it is sacred rigor, the discipline that keeps a sword from turning into a scythe.
Without context, we swing steel in the dark—striking bodies but never the chains that bind them. With it, we can name the chain, trace its length, and anchor our effort where it might finally snap.
Because context is not a footnote; it is the margin that keeps the story from collapsing into propaganda.
The Shape of True Justice
Chip away the marble facades and the Latin maxims, and justice reveals itself as less a courtroom ritual than a covenant: We will repair what we can, transform what we must, and remember what we dare not repeat.
Its geometry is built on three structural beams—Accountability, Restoration, and Prevention—and it collapses if any one of them buckles.
1. Accountability − Naming harm without hunting scapegoats
Accountability is more than finger‑pointing; it is the sober practice of naming an injury accurately—who was harmed, how, and by whose hand or policy. South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission called this public truth: the idea that wounds fester in the dark but begin to heal under light. Corporate apology statements that say “mistakes were made” are linguistic escape hatches. True justice locks the hatch and insists on subjects, verbs, and reparations.
2. Restoration − Returning dignity as urgently as restitution
Money matters—ask anyone who has ever tried to heal on an empty stomach—but restoration travels deeper. It re‑knits social fabric: clearing wrongful records so employment is possible, funding community‑authored memorials so grief has a voice, rewriting textbooks so erased histories stand up in classroom roll calls. Restoration takes the ledger of harm and writes a second column titled wholeness.
3. Prevention − Re‑engineering the conditions that bred the harm
A repaired roof is good; moving the factory that rains soot on that roof is better. Prevention looks at zoning codes, budget lines, hiring pipelines, algorithmic training sets—the “boring” levers of power—and rearranges them so the next generation inherits fewer traps. It asks, “Will the grand‑daughter of today’s plaintiff face the same cliff edge?” If the answer is yes, the work is unfinished.
Even among justice’s pillars, the load is rarely evenly shared. Restoration may delay accountability; prevention may resist closure. The work is not to resolve the tension—but to hold it with care, and remember:
When accountability fails, silence impersonates closure. When restoration fails, pain festers into vengeance. When prevention is ignored, harm becomes cyclical.
Justice inhabits the tension between mercy and memory. Mercy speaks to the potential of the wrong‑doer; memory protects the wounded from amnesia disguised as peace. Revenge wants mirrored pain. Justice demands changed reality: Did the neighborhood breathe easier? Did the pattern break? Did the next child inherit a lighter burden?
It is slower than rage, harder than vengeance, and infinitely more human—because it believes that people and systems, once unmasked, can choose to become something better than their past.
The Practice of Justice
Justice doesn’t wait for a courtroom. It takes up residence in the unglamorous minutes most of us rush past—the lunch line, the budget meeting, the comment section, the family group chat. Where power hums quietly, justice listens louder.
It begins with curiosity: a pause long enough to ask, Who isn’t in this room, and why? It grows into discipline: reading the policy’s footnotes, checking the headline’s source, attending the neighborhood meeting even when the streetlights flicker and the snacks are stale.
Some days it looks like paperwork—filing an appeal nobody thinks will succeed because precedent should never outrank principle. Other days it looks like presence—choosing the subway over the promoted rideshare so you can hear what the city mutters between stops.
Justice is the teacher who notices the reading list lists only victors and rewrites it until the margins speak. It’s the software engineer who audits the facial‑recognition dataset and refuses to ship until the bias metrics drop. It’s the physician who adds a social‑risk screener to intake forms and then fights the billing department to keep the extra minutes uncompensated.
Often it is quieter still: the coworker who flags a résumé because the last name triggers someone else’s prejudice. The friend who chooses honesty over harmony at the dinner table. The stranger who keeps filming when the uniformed officer says, “Move along.”
At its core, the practice of justice is the habit of staying—staying in the uncomfortable question, the tedious process, the long corridor of reform after the cameras leave. Skill builds like callus: discernment sharpens, patience thickens, courage steadies. What felt radical becomes reflex.
It is less a mantle taken up once than a muscle exercised daily—until the weight that once shook your grip becomes the baseline strength you lend to others.
The Price of Justice
Justice collects its dues in currencies most insurance policies don’t cover.
Convenience is the first levy. The meeting drags because questions pierce the agenda. The commute detours so you can speak at a zoning board hearing for a neighborhood you don’t live in—but whose residents’ voices keep getting tabled. Bureaucracy multiplies: extra forms, extra calls, extra hours no one logs on a timesheet. The minutes may feel wasted until you see a policy paragraph change and realize those minutes traded anonymity for accountability.
Safety comes next. Power does not enjoy mirrors. File the grievance and your performance reviews suddenly grow frosty. Publish the dataset and your inbox swells with legal threats thinly veiled as “concerns.” Sometimes the retaliation is subtle—a budget quietly reallocated, a promotion evaporated. Sometimes it is blunt: armed warrants for documents that embarrass the issuer. The risk is real, but so is the coalition you discover—others who step forward because your audacity turned isolation into invitation.
Relationships tighten or snap. The holiday toast curdles when you mention wage theft. The group chat omits you after you challenge a slur passed off as a joke. Yet the thinning reveals grain: those who stay have heard your full sentence and still pour another cup of coffee.
Reputation fractures in public square and algorithm alike. The comment section calls you divisive; the op‑ed labels you radical; the professional association whispers “not a team player.” But reputations are brittle; credibility built on candor survives the fall.
Livelihood can wobble. Whistle‑blowers lose pensions. Organizers watch funding vanish. Consultants forfeit lucrative contracts by refusing to rubber‑stamp a bias audit. Bills tighten. Resolve must tighten faster.
And yet—something returns.
The late‑night email from a colleague who says your advice saved her from quitting. The quiet handshake from a janitor who saw you confront the manager and felt, for the first time, that someone noticed. The policy rewrite that removes a clause older than your birth certificate. The small victory stacks atop another until a skyline appears where only barriers once stood.
Justice’s interest isn’t paid in cash but in clarity: you know who you are, where you stand, and whom you stand with. That dividend compounds. It forges networks, thickens skin without hardening the heart, and teaches a muscle memory for courage.
So the price is steep—but the return is a ledger no thief can erase, a freedom no tyrant can foreclose, and a name Dike may write in ink that does not fade.
The Verdict Remembered
At sunrise the courthouse statue looks honest enough—bronze eyelids sealed, scales motionless, sword asleep at her side. But statues keep only the stories chiseled into their bases, and Dike has always collected more names than stone can hold.
The Olympians thought exile could be cast in metal. They mistook stillness for surrender, forgetting that a goddess is not her effigy. So while tourists pose for photographs, the real Dike walks the margins—ledger tucked under her arm, quill worn to a whisper, counting not convictions but corrections.
When a judge tosses a debtor’s prison statute, her pen moves. When a city reallocates riot‑gear funds to after‑school meals, a fresh line appears. When a teenager’s record is expunged because the science finally outran the fear, she writes weight removed in careful script.
She records failures too—the untested rape kits, the water that still runs brown, the name of every prisoner locked away by an algorithm that never learned their language. Yet even those entries hold space for revision, as though she believes we might still cross them out someday.
The statue remains blind, but Dike is not. She sees every hand that steadies a wobbling ladder, every shoulder that wedges itself beneath a sagging beam. She sees the price they pay—jobs stalled, friendships frayed, nights paced in legal‑fees panic. And for each cost she adds a column titled Worth.
Perhaps she is writing your name. Perhaps she already has. The criteria are simple:
- Did you reduce harm? Yes or No.
- Did you restore dignity? Yes or No.
No laurels, no rankings, just a ledger that tilts the scales away from symmetry and toward repair.
Perhaps one day she will carry that book back up Olympus and lay it on the same marble floor where the scales once clattered. The gods will open it expecting another rebellion and will find instead a map—streets renamed after children who lived, rivers running clear where they once burned, policies annotated in the margins with the word Enough.
And, perhaps, in that moment the old verdict will crack like plaster under a fresh coat of truth. The statue may stay blind, but justice—eyes open, hands steady—will already be everywhere else, carried by those who dared to look, and stayed to mend.
Perhaps, that’s how she returns—not in vengeance, but in vigilance.
Leave a comment