Recently, I wrote an article about control, followed by another on Nihilism vs. Stoicism and the performative circus of our political climate. Afterward, while discussing these ideas, someone casually mentioned that they didn’t like Stoicism because it enables people like a rather (in)famous individual with a name suspiciously similar to Sandrew State.
I nearly choked on my drink. Stoicism? Enabling him? That was like saying Shakespeare enabled bad fanfiction or that fitness culture is to blame for dudes skipping leg day. But as I dug deeper, I realized they were right—sort of.
Stoicism holds a special place for me. I discovered Meditations at a formative time in my life, just as I was shaping the kind of person I wanted to be and the world I wanted to build around me. I’d already seen enough examples of people prone to rage, despair, financial foolishness—excesses of every kind. But Marcus Aurelius became one of my first true role models in ethics, resilience, and personal discipline.
So, imagine my horror when I found out that some of the ideas I hold dear were being twisted into grotesque weapons—not tools for building a better world, but clubs used to bludgeon others under the guise of wisdom.
That’s why I had to write this response. What follows isn’t just about setting the record straight—it’s about reclaiming a philosophy that has helped people for thousands of years from those who seek to corrupt it.
As always, thanks for reading, and may we all strive for wisdom, not just the appearance of it.
Stoicism, an ancient philosophy anchored in virtue, wisdom, and resilience, has lately been co-opted by certain online influencers who twist its core ideals to validate bigotry and toxic masculinity. Chief among these groups are self-professed “red pill” communities, which dress up their ideological poison as “true Stoicism.”
Make no mistake: this is no harmless misunderstanding—it’s a strategic distortion that sells quick-fix emotional “solutions” while promoting dominance, detachment, and misogyny. Many men turn to these red-pill interpretations in good faith, hoping to become stronger and more composed. But in practice, these teachings often lead to brittle defensiveness rather than true resilience. The damage isn’t limited to individuals; this twisting of Stoicism corrodes broader discourse around mental health, relationships, and personal responsibility.
In this article, we’ll see why Stoicism still matters profoundly in our modern world, explore its authentic roots, expose how it’s being corrupted in certain internet corners, and show how we can reclaim it as a force for genuine ethical living and growth.
Why Stoicism Matters Today
Despite its ancient origins, Stoicism remains deeply relevant. Modern life is hectic, brimming with stressors such as constant digital notifications, social pressures to “keep up,” and global uncertainties that heighten anxiety. Stoicism’s focus on recognizing what’s within our control—and making peace with what isn’t—offers a sturdy framework for navigating these complexities.
Moreover, Stoic practices like self-reflection, gratitude, and mindful action can promote mental well-being in an age that often confuses fleeting pleasure with genuine happiness. Real Stoicism equips us to handle conflict, maintain inner balance, and contribute positively to the world.
The True Nature of Stoicism
To spot a counterfeit, we first need to know the real thing. Stoicism took shape in the early 3rd century BCE under Zeno of Citium, who, after surviving a shipwreck, began teaching that inner virtue and alignment with nature are the paths to lasting fulfillment.
His successors refined this philosophy:
- Seneca: A statesman and prolific writer who saw power and wealth as spiritually insignificant, emphasizing instead the importance of wisdom, self-control, and ethical integrity.
- Epictetus: Once enslaved, he famously taught that external circumstances should never dictate our freedom; our judgments and responses are ours alone.
- Marcus Aurelius: A Roman Emperor who led with Stoic principles of humility, justice, and compassion. His Meditations offer timeless reflections on leadership and moral fortitude.
All of these figures stressed the four Stoic virtues—wisdom, courage, moderation, and justice—while clarifying that genuine Stoicism encourages regulated (not repressed) emotions, empathy toward others, and the recognition that some things lie beyond our control.
Myths vs. Stoic Reality
To clarify how authentic Stoicism contrasts with popular misconceptions, let’s break down a few myths:
| Myth | Authentic Stoic Perspective |
|---|---|
| “Emotions are weakness.” | Emotions are natural signals; they should be understood and guided by reason, not buried. |
| “Stoics are cold and detached.” | Stoics value healthy relationships, social responsibility, and empathy. |
| “Stoicism is about domination.” | True Stoicism seeks self-mastery—virtue and reason—not control over others. |
| “It’s a ‘tough guy’ philosophy.” | Stoicism applies to everyone, emphasizing universal virtues that transcend gender or status. |
How the Red Pill Poisons the Stoic
In certain “red pill” and “manosphere” communities, Stoicism is misrepresented to bolster bigotry and callous behaviors. Their typical distortions include:
- Emotional Suppression: They teach that vulnerability is weakness, twisting the Stoic concept of self-control into a demand for total emotional shutdown.
- Misogyny Disguised as Rationality: They brand women as inherently “emotional” and inferior—warping Stoic appreciation of reason into a blatant hierarchy of supposed male supremacy.
- Isolation as Strength: They push the idea that caring for others leads to weakness, misreading Stoic caution against unhealthy attachment as a command to avoid closeness altogether.
- Pursuit of Dominance: They portray Stoicism as a toolkit for lording power over others, contradicting the Stoic ideal of humility and fairness.
This version of Stoicism creates a self-reinforcing cycle: men suppress emotions, become isolated, then double down on detachment as a “solution”—making genuine connection and growth even harder to attain.
A Real-World Example
Imagine a workplace conflict: A colleague criticizes your approach to a project. The “red pill Stoic” responds with hostility or ice-cold detachment, dismissing the colleague as “emotional” or “unworthy” of respect. By contrast, an authentic Stoic would pause, reflect, and ask: Is this critique valid? What can I control here? Can I address the issue calmly and ethically? Instead of lashing out or demeaning the colleague, the genuine Stoic focuses on reason, self-awareness, and respectful dialogue—elevating the workplace dynamic rather than fracturing it.
Conclusion: An Invitation to Real Growth
The online “red pill” spin on Stoicism is a cheap impostor, offering hollow bravado and contempt for others. Genuine Stoicism, however, remains a vibrant guide to enduring wisdom, self-control, and empathetic citizenship—a philosophy as vital now as it was thousands of years ago.
A truly Stoic individual strives for inner calm and moral clarity, recognizing that real strength blossoms from understanding emotions rather than denying them. He or she values relationships as rich opportunities for growth, viewing vulnerability not as a flaw but as an honest feature of our shared humanity.
A red-pill imitator, by contrast, is trapped—taught to mistake detachment for strength, left unfulfilled by a philosophy that offers control but delivers isolation. This performance of “toughness” inevitably cracks under the weight of life’s tests.
If you’re new to Stoicism or wary after encountering these twisted versions, remember: authentic Stoicism is open to everyone, regardless of background. Take a step onto this path by studying the original texts, reflecting on your daily actions, and seeking wisdom in challenges rather than retreating into hostility. In doing so, you’ll find a philosophy that not only strengthens your spirit but also encourages genuine compassion toward others—a guide for living with virtue in a turbulent world.
Leave a comment